欧洲人权案例Europe
当前位置:首页 > 人权案例 > 欧洲人权案例 >
欧洲人权案例Europe

Kolesnik v. Ukraine (application no. 17551/02)

时间:2009-11-22      来源:本站      作者:admin      点击:
SELF-INCRIMINATING STATEMENTS MADE IN THE ABSENCE OF A LAWYER CANNOT SERVE AS MAIN BASIS FOR CRIMINAL CONVICTION Violation of Article 6 1 and 3 (c) and (d) (right to defend oneself and right to have witnesses examined) of the European Conve

SELF-INCRIMINATING STATEMENTS MADE IN THE ABSENCE OF A LAWYER CANNOT SERVE AS MAIN BASIS FOR CRIMINAL CONVICTION Violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) and (d) (right to defend oneself and right to have witnesses examined) of the European Convention on Human Rights

 

Kolesnik是一名乌克兰公民,因为涉嫌故意杀人和抢劫与1998年11月被捕。在没有得到法律援助的情况下,他承认了自己和其他3名嫌疑犯杀害了在1998年8月和10月杀害了2人。后来Kolesnik翻供,辩称是警方强迫他做出的供述并剥夺了他会见律师的权利。在被指派了一名律师之后,Kolesnik为自己作了无罪辩护。法庭发现公诉方在调查中有违背刑诉法规定的行为,要求检察部门补充侦查。在进行了补充侦查后,Kolesnik被认定有罪,判处14年有期徒刑并在Zhytomyr一直被关押至今。Kolensnik在狱中向欧洲人权法院起诉。法院认为乌克兰当局在审判中没有充分保障Kolensnik合法权利,认定其违背了欧洲人权公约第6条第1款和第3款。

 

联系我国日益严重的刑讯逼供,本案的案情值得深思。

详细内容请见:

http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&documentId=858422&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649

 

 

分享到:0
标签:
延伸阅读Related Articles
推荐阅读What's Popular
相关栏目Related Sections
人权案例Cases
人权文件Documents
人权机构Organizations
继续阅读

Andrulewicz v Poland (No 2) (App no
[2009] ECHR 40807/07 Andrulewicz v Poland (No 2) (App no 40807/07) EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (FO...